CELEBRITY
BREAKING: Trump’s Venezuela Bombing Is ILLEGAL – and It’s IMPEACHABLE. A legal expert is now explaining why Donald Trump’s military action against Venezuela is not just reckless, but illegal under U.S. law – and why one buried fact changes everything
A legal expert is now explaining why Donald Trump’s military action against Venezuela is not just reckless, but illegal under U.S. law – and why one buried fact changes everything: the bombing did not start recently. It began months ago, in September.
That single detail detonates the administration’s entire legal defense.
Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the rules are explicit:
When a president introduces U.S. armed forces into hostilities without a declaration of war or specific authorization from Congress, the law gives the president 60 days to obtain congressional approval. If Congress does not approve the action, the military operation must stop.
There are no loopholes. There is no reset button.
Public reporting shows that U.S. forces began bombing Venezuelan-linked boats in September, using American military force abroad. Under the War Powers Resolution, that use of force qualifies as hostilities.
Congress did not declare war. Congress did not authorize the strikes. And Congress was never asked to approve them within the required 60-day window.
That means the legal clock started in September.
And it expired months ago.
“That’s the part people are missing,” said Joe Gallina, an attorney with training in international and cross-border criminal law. “Once U.S. bombs were used in September against those boats in the Caribbean, the War Powers Resolution was triggered.
Everything that followed runs on that same clock. And that clock is long expired.”
That is why this is not merely controversial policy. It is a clear violation of U.S. law.
Legal scholars note that knowingly continuing military operations after the War Powers deadline, without congressional authorization, is not just unlawful – it is impeachable conduct. The statute was written after Vietnam to prevent presidents from doing exactly this.
“This is the kind of abuse of power the impeachment clause exists to address,” Gallina said. “Defying Congress and the law on matters of war is not something the Constitution allows.”
Under normal circumstances, Congress would act. But with Republicans barely allowing the government to function – blocking oversight and shielding executive misconduct – accountability through impeachment has effectively been paralyzed.
That leaves one remaining recourse.
The midterms. And we’re ready.
BREAKING NEWS: Epstein survivors have reportedly begun compiling their own list of names—independent of any official government release. The first ten names mentioned are already sending shockwaves through Washington and across the country, reigniting intense public scrutiny and political tension. But what’s drawing the most attention now is Donald Trump’s reaction. Observers say his response has raised fresh questions, with many Americans asking why he appears so unsettled as the revelations unfold.
BREAKING: Don Lemon erupts on Donald Trump, calling him “a criminal president” and saying the record is undeniable. Lemon pointed to Trump’s convictions, liabilities, and repeated indictments, adding, “I could say it 34 times and still be accurate.” Then he dropped a bombshell: as questions around the Epstein files resurface, Lemon suggested the sudden focus on Venezuela is no coincidence. “Every time Epstein gets close to daylight, something else explodes,” he said.
NEW: Sen. Mark Kelly RESPONDS to Pete Hegseth for censuring him, cutting his military pension, threatening to demote his rank, and warning of possible criminal prosecution for telling soldiers to obey their oath.
BREAKING: Kamala Harris breaks the silence on Venezuela, calling the move unlawful, reckless, and dangerously misleading. She argued the action doesn’t make America safer or cheaper, warning it resembles past regime-change interventions sold as strength but paid for by American families. Harris said labeling Maduro a brutal dictator does not justify bypassing legal authority or launching a conflict with no clear exit. Harris dismissed claims that the action is about drugs or democracy, suggesting oil and power politics are driving the decision instead. Now, shockwaves are spreading after Donald Trump issued a brutal response to Harris — a reaction that’s igniting fierce debate and raising tensions nationwide.
BREAKING (15 MINUTES AGO): Congress has formally moved to file impeachment articles against Donald Trump, accusing him of a serious constitutional violation linked to U.S. actions in Venezuela. Lawmakers argue the strike was not a lawful military operation but an illegal act of aggression carried out without congressional approval—violating Article I of the Constitution and the War Powers Act. They say it directly challenges Congress’s exclusive authority to declare war. The filing also alleges a broader pattern of executive overreach. But what’s fueling intense backlash now is Trump’s defiant and unusually awkward response, which has sparked confusion, outrage, and fierce debate nationwide.
JUST IN: A source confirms the Department of Justice has failed to provide Congress with the legally required explanation for redactions in the newly released Epstein files—despite a January 3 statutory deadline mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Lawmakers say the silence raises fresh questions about what information is being withheld and why. But that’s not all. The same source reveals quiet moves now underway in Congress in response to the recent Venezuela attack, actions reportedly taken without congressional approval. Behind closed doors, pressure is building—and Donald Trump may be heading for a confrontation the public hasn’t yet been told about.
BREAKING: Mexico’s President FIRES BACK at U.S. Invasion Threats. In the aftermath of the U.S. bombing of Venezuela, Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum delivers a thunderous response that’s sending shockwaves across the region. “We are not Venezuela,” she declared, making it clear Mexico will not tolerate foreign interference. With millions of Mexicans worldwide and the backing of Latin America, Sheinbaum emphasized that Mexico’s sovereignty is non-negotiable—from every street to every barrio. But she didn’t stop there. The president went on to warn of drastic countermeasures, including tightening borders and reassessing the presence of American expatriates in Mexico. Then came the moment everyone’s talking about: Sheinbaum released a final statement that analysts are already calling “Trump’s worst nightmare.”
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has sent shockwaves through Washington after issuing a chilling, mind-blowing statement in response to Rep. Mike Levin. Levin had just announced plans to introduce a constitutional amendment that would ban self-pardons and block presidents from pardoning family members, administration officials, campaign staff, or anyone who commits crimes to protect the president. Trump’s response immediately ignited outrage and intense debate, with critics calling the statement alarming and unprecedented, while supporters rushed to defend it. Now, Americans are asking a serious question: Should a sitting president ever make a statement like this—and what does it mean for the future of presidential power?
Trump Drops a Bombshell: Greenland, Military Moves, and a Chilling Epstein Remark. President Donald Trump has confirmed that the United States intends to take control of Greenland, a declaration that has already sent shockwaves across the international community. Almost simultaneously, reports emerged that 10 U.S. C-17 military aircraft had touched down in the United Kingdom, fueling speculation about what may be unfolding behind the scenes. But Trump didn’t stop there. In a follow-up statement, he issued remarks that many are now describing as direct threats toward Cuba and Mexico, raising fresh concerns about regional stability and U.S. foreign policy intentions. The most shocking moment, however, came when Trump turned to the Epstein files. What he said next was brief—but chilling. According to critics, his words appeared to confirm the very fears many have quietly held for years, leaving the public asking: What does Trump know, and why is he saying it now?
BREAKING: Venezuela’s Vice President has issued a fiery declaration, claiming their president was abducted and warning the world that the country is ready to defend its land and resources at all costs. “Our president was abducted. We are prepared to defend our land and our resources,” she said. “Venezuela will never be a colony.” But she didn’t stop there. In a stunning escalation, the Vice President went on to reveal the contents of a mind-blowing message she says Donald Trump sent to their president before the abduction—a message that is now sending shockwaves across borders.
JUST IN: Rachel Maddow sounds the alarm on Venezuela — and her questions are unsettling. “There are very few Americans right now who have any idea why the United States did this,” Maddow said, pointing to a glaring gap between official explanations and the facts on the ground. She then delivered a stunning contradiction: If this was really about drug trafficking, why did President Trump just pardon the former president of Honduras — a man convicted of sending hundreds of tons of drugs into the United States? But Maddow didn’t stop there. She went on to reveal the most unexpected factor now fueling political turmoil — a buried detail that threatens to unravel the administration’s entire narrative and could change how this story is understood.
